Access Key     Description
1Home Page
| Home Page |

Connect Issue 28
20 July 2009

 

Welcome to the latest issue of Connect

Hello, and welcome to Connect.

If, like me, you sometimes struggle with today’s TwitterBook technology, then you may want to consider getting a Second Life…

I recently had the pleasure of meeting Liz Falconer, an IOSH member from the University of the West of England. Liz came to The Grange to talk about the pioneering work she and her colleagues were doing around e-learning – in particular, the use of virtual reality to teach the next generation of safety and health professionals.

For those who don’t know, Second Life is an online, three-dimensional virtual world that allows businesses and universities to create computer-generated environments and ‘simulate’ real-time events.

Liz and her team have created and simulated a ‘virtual accident’ which takes place in a warehouse. Students can study the accident from the point of view of investigators, as well as witnesses, by interacting with the online environments and other characters in the simulation.

Although in its infancy, the work that Liz is leading could have huge benefits for everyone in the profession. To learn more about Second Life and how e-learning could benefit your organisation, listen to Liz in our latest On the Record feature.

Staying with the technology theme, we travel to Oxfordshire to meet Renault F1 team’s safety manager John Trigell. He talks to Connect amid the roar of finely tuned engines and banks of laptops about how safety in the factory, and in the pit garage, can ultimately lead to the safety of the racing drivers.

We also have the last in a series of articles on REACH, in which we discuss how the regulation requires change to the content of safety data sheets as well as to the way they’re used.

As well as features, we’ve the latest news, including how bosses at a Corus steelworks have increased the number of safety drills after 22 near fatalities in less than a year, and how details of the ICL inquiry have been published.

Finally, many thanks to those members who enquired about our free job hunting workshop. Places are now full, but please continue to contact us with your details as we’re planning to extend these workshops to other areas of the country shortly.

Thanks for reading and if you want to be featured in one of our articles, or have something to say about Connect or IOSH, please drop me a line.

Shaun Gibbons,
e-Editor, IOSH.



Guidance: what you need to know

In our fourth and final article on REACH, we look at safety data sheets for those who deal with dangerous substances and mixtures.

REACH – safety data sheets

Headlines

  • REACH requires changes to the content of safety data sheets (SDSs) and to the way they're used
  • Substances registered with REACH need a chemical safety assessment (CSA)
  • CLP, the European regulation on the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances, also has implications for the information needed in SDSs

What’s it about?

In previous issues of Connect, we’ve discussed the responsibilities of manufacturers, importers and downstream users under REACH. The Chemicals (Hazard Information and Packaging for Supply) Regulations 2002 require suppliers of dangerous substances and mixtures to provide SDSs to customers. REACH, along with CLP, has changed some of the requirements for SDSs.

Who has to supply SDSs?

A manufacturer, importer, downstream user or a distributor has to supply SDSs if they deal with substances or mixtures which are regarded as dangerous.

Which substances and mixtures are regarded as dangerous?

A substance or mixture is seen as dangerous if it:

Are SDSs needed for anything else?

A customer can ask for an SDS for mixtures that aren’t classified as dangerous, but which contain substances that might be dangerous above a stated concentration. More details are in the HSE Bitesize publication ‘REACH and safety data sheets’.

What has to be included in the SDS?

Article 31 and Annex II of REACH give more detailed requirements for SDSs. These include:

  • contact information, such as an email and postal address and telephone number, of a 'competent person' in the supplier organisation
  • hazards identification which now comes before ingredients, to highlight how important this information is.

The SDS must also be in an official language of the member state where the substance or mixture is placed on the market. A more significant change is the inclusion of chemical safety assessment data.

Who has to do a chemical safety assessment?

REACH applies to chemical substances imported or manufactured in quantities over one tonne per year. Chemical substances imported in quantities over 10 tonnes per year require a CSA, which needs to include the assessment of hazards to people’s health and to the environment. If a registrant believes that a chemical is dangerous, they should identify how the chemical will be used by downstream users, and develop exposure scenarios accordingly. Downstream users will need to co-operate in this process to make sure that their use is included. The exposure scenarios, along with any risk management measures, must be included in the SDS.

What about CLP?

The European regulation on the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) came into effect in January 2009. This provides new labels and, in some cases, a new classification for substances and mixtures. The new classification can appear on SDSs immediately, but the old classification under the Dangerous Substances Directive or Dangerous Preparations Directive must also be shown until June 2015. If a mixture or substance is classified, labelled and packaged according to CLP, it must be included on the SDS. In any case, SDSs for substances must show the new classification from December 2010 and SDSs for mixtures from June 2015. The timeline is illustrated here.

When do new SDSs have to be produced?

An SDS should be provided to customers either at or before the first delivery of a substance or mixture. If the SDS hasn’t been changed, the supplier doesn’t need to reissue it each time a delivery is made. Although the SDS requirements of REACH became law in June 2007, the HSE is content that suppliers should update the SDS to the new requirements as they reprint them. However, as new information becomes available through the registration process, SDSs will need to be updated to include exposure scenarios. SDSs will also need to be updated when an authorisation is granted or refused, or when a restriction is imposed under REACH.

IOSH links:

Guidance: what you need to know (Connect, 16 March 2009) 'REACH'
Guidance: what you need to know (Connect, 4 May 2009) 'REACH – your responsibilities as a user of chemicals'
Guidance: what you need to know (Connect, 15 June 2009) 'REACH – your responsibilities as an importer or manufacturer of chemicals'

Related links:


Spotlight: pole position

Hidden away in the quiet Oxfordshire countryside sits a multi-million pound factory, where cars capable of producing 110 decibels are being worked on ready for the next race in the highest class of motor racing – Formula 1. Renault F1 is one of 10 teams that take part in this ever popular motorsport. John Trigell, Team Safety Manager, talks to Connect about working in this fast paced environment…

Behind the glamorous veneer of Formula 1 is a lot of hard work, not only out on the track with the drivers but back at the factory where these powerful cars take form. John Trigell says:

“How safely the job’s done at the factory leads to the job being done safely in the garage at the races, which ultimately keeps the drivers safe.

“The cars are all made to technical regulations that are formulated through the sporting body, the FIA, and the technical people in the teams. Everyone has been very stringent with safety following Ayrton Senna’s fatal crash in 1994, and since that accident all drivers have thankfully walked away unscathed from any incidents.”

Robert Kubica, a driver for the BMW team, was involved in a terrifying accident in 2007.

“He walked away and his crash was testament to what’s been put in place. Big changes to the survival cell design, materials used and on track procedures have been made and this has worked its way through the culture of all the teams.”

On average there are 25 people in a pit crew who work on the car during a race. The chance of anyone getting injured is rare – and that’s down to the safety measures that have been brought in through the years. An accident in 1994, when the Renault team was previously Benetton, happened when the fuel hose came off and a fire broke out. Since then, double automatic cut-offs have been introduced to avoid fuel coming out if the hose accidentally comes off the car.

Accidents where pit crew have been run over or dragged along with the hose are always remembered, but they are fortunately rare. In total, up to 60 pit stop practices are carried out over the course of a race weekend.

“Everyone is extremely well practised and they all know exactly what they need to do during those few seconds the car’s in the pit. The team does its job safely because they can’t afford not to. Errors can cost time, the race and even the world championship.

“I have a helping hand at the races from the racing body, the FIA, so we’ll look at the risks together. The pit area is under heavy restrictions and guidelines from the FIA because the last thing the industry wants is for something to go wrong and be televised.

Back at the factory, John has responsibility for the safety of around 475 workers. He covers everything to do with manufacturing including welding and fabrication, metal machining, oven curing, electronics, general mechanics as well as the many other processes that are involved in production of the cars.
 
John can face challenges when it comes to the cutting edge technology involved in the industry.

“Sometimes it can test the boundaries of knowledge and because this sport is shrouded in confidentiality, I can’t always get advice from outside the business so I have to rely on the team’s technicians and engineers for an understanding.

“When the Kinetic Energy Recovery System was introduced on the cars for the 2009 season, I worked with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts because they were using the battery technology in their deep sea rovers. As this technology hadn’t been used before in the Formula One industry, I had to research it thoroughly because with new products you never know what issues could come up.”

The factory is dominated by computer-operated machinery.

“Even though the team doesn’t necessarily work with these machines, they do have to empty them.

“We have rapid prototyping machines that can create epoxy dust when emptied. Workers always wear the right clothing, including gloves and respiratory masks. We also run comprehensive health programmes and if these flag something up then we’ll change our working procedures.”

Renault F1’s factory accident rates are low for the number of people working on site compared to general manufacturing. He uses a combined Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code from the manufacturing and entertainment industry. Their rates are currently 65 per cent lower than industry standard. Says John:

“The accidents we have are usually very minor ones such as a graze or nick from a scalpel. We encourage people to report these minor incidents so we get a good idea of where we have issues and what those issues are.

“Known issues are then addressed, such as the scalpel cuts suffered by people working in our composite department. As these are our most common accidents, we got involved with the Royal London College of Surgeons, because if anyone knows how to use a scalpel it’s these guys!

“We’re fortunate to not have many serious injuries because people take their time. The equipment they’re working with is so expensive, and if a certain part needs to be at a circuit then they can’t afford to make mistakes when the clock’s against them – this certainly lends itself to improving our statistics.”

In 2006 John saw the need for extra guidance and input. Together with all the UK F1 teams, a couple of their engine manufacturers, their insurers and the Silverstone circuit, he formed a safety group.

“So far it’s been very productive for problem-solving. Because our manufacturing issues are the same and we use the same materials, we discuss training ideas, new chemicals and projects. And ultimately our goal is the same – to get two cars on the grid as safely as possible.

“Working from a six-page checklist, to make sure that the 30 tonnes of equipment we pack up and take around the world runs smoothly and safely, is pretty tough anyway – but add to that temperatures of 40 degrees in Malaysia and you’ve got a whole new ball game. The team has such stamina, though, and the amount of work everyone puts in is remarkable, and that’s something I’m proud to be part of.”

Factfile:

  • John Trigell has been a member of IOSH and the Environmental and Waste Management Group for six years
  • Renault debuted their first car at Silverstone in 1977
  • The Renault F1 team has competed in 257 races

Links:

Renault F1

Formula 1

FIA


Quote me

IOSH gets its message across...

The Huddersfield Daily Examiner

IOSH President Nattasha Freeman spoke to The Huddersfield Daily Examiner about the drop in workplace deaths since last year. She said:

“We’ve got a huge task to do to make sure deaths continue to fall, particularly at the time of the recession when firms want to cut costs. We need workers to continue to be vigilant and to tell their employers of health and safety concerns they have.”

Shropshire Star

Nattasha also spoke to the Shropshire Star about the fall in workplace deaths. She said:

“These figures show the true need for health and safety in this country. It shows that health and safety isn’t just mindless bureaucracy, brought in to make life difficult or prevent us enjoying our lives. It’s about preventing true tragedy that destroys lives.”

BBC Three Counties Radio

BBC Three Counties Radio interviewed IOSH immediate past president Ray Hurst about how parents were banned from attending a school sports day because teachers couldn’t adequately supervise a large number of adults. Ray said:

“I think this is nonsense and gives health and safety a bad name. Perhaps it’s a case of somebody thinking that if something goes wrong, what the consequences are for me as an individual, and therefore not going ahead with the event.”

Leicester Mercury

The Leicester Mercury talked to a number of local organisations, including IOSH, to find evidence of any recovery from the current recession. Caroline Holden, IOSH’s commercial affairs director, said:

“Our training business is buoyant and we’re seeing a lot of interest from organisations. Our view would be that we’re cautiously optimistic, and nurturing and encouraging new and existing clients is the best recipe for success in the current climate.”

Facilities Management UK

IOSH Chief Executive Rob Strange told Facilities Management UK about the Institution’s recently launched manifesto and the four challenges facing UK workplaces. He said:

“Our manifesto is both a clear statement of intent and a call to action. It presents what we believe needs to happen to make the UK a healthy and safe place to work.

“Last year we saw 229 workers killed in Britain’s workplaces, 229,000 more were injured and in excess of two million had an illness they put down to their work. To make consistent improvements on these figures, all of them personal crises, we call on the government and others to really get behind the initiatives set out in the manifesto.”

Workplace Law Magazine

IOSH immediate past president Ray Hurst spoke to Workplace Law Magazine about how health and safety has become a scapegoat for the media. He said:

“Health and safety is not about stopping people doing anything – it is about enabling them to do it safely.”

BBC Radio Derby

Bill Edwards, IOSH’s senior designer, was invited by critically acclaimed film director Shane Meadows to create the opening credits to his new film, called Le Donk and Scor-Zay-Zee. He spoke to BBC Radio Derby and explained how this opportunity came about:

“I entered a short animation in a competition on Shane Meadows’ website. Shane was judging the competition and the idea was that six of the entries would appear as extras on the DVD of the film.

“But then a few days later, he called me to say he really liked my animation and wanted me to produce another for the opening sequence.”